Prowlingowl.com

Like the 3,200 other pages of evidence uncovered and descriptions of crimes on this site, this web page is only one part of a massive multi-state entanglement of government corruption and cover-up. See size

Evidence was uncovered in parts over years, and not in the same order as the crimes occurred or the evidence was created. Statements were made based on what was known at the time.

Dates are approximate because government filings and reports vary in some cases up to months if not This is part of cover up. One example is Oklahoma's Openbooks, which started out late with only a fraction of what was required to be added each year. Plus, the data was littered with data entry and spelling errors, meaning you have to go through one entry at a time. This amount to more than 17,000 entries in 2017.

Multi-State Entanglement and Cover-up of Crimes.
Here is the deal. I am and was a resident of Oklahoma. I had no connection or any knowledge of the crimes in Colorado until nearly a year after the crimes were exposed and the FBI notified Why did the FBI frame. It was an act of website retalation for exposing evidence larger crimes in Oklahoma and evidence of crimes in Colorado after the crimes were exposed, and victims in Colorado find the website and sent their evidence for me to post on the website.
Crimes Crimes Occurred(a) Crimes Uncovered(b) View
The Oklahoma FBI stole, subverted, and did not investigate instead bungled a January 2009 Colorado bank fraud investigation. The FBI framed me as a Confidential Informant in the Colorado case. 2006???? 
  • The FBI framed me as a Confidential Informant in the Colorado case, to use as a shield, so that they could use me to avoid contact with victims, witnesses, and evidence of crimes. It was a clever scheme to a point. The scheme left the FBI in the dark, and when evidence of more crimes was uncovered Apr 2010. The FBI made more mistakes that created more evidence* of crimes and cover-up. The FBI resorted to attempted bribery (Colorado frame innocent parties) and threats (supress Oklahoma evidence).
    		•   
  • *1,500 Confidential Oklahoma Tax Commission emails
    		• Nov 2008Apr 2010View
      
    The DOJ (US Attorney General) did not reveal the FBI's bungled role in the investigation and evidence of other crimes to the jury in the court case that occurred in June 2016 (OKWD 15 CR 00085)(1.7). Among other things, this prevented FBI agents from having to testify under oath.2006???? 
    Evidence uncovered after the 2016 criminal trial OKWD 15 CR 00085(1.7) includes the names and amounts redacted in the 1,500 blown-off OTC emails.2006????View
  • How and why did the Oklahoma FBI steal and not investigate a Colorado bank fraud investigation?
    		• 2009???? 
  • The FBI, FDIC, DOJ, and Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) had previously covered up for the same banker, Paul Harold Doughty. Re: the missing 1981/82 Oklahoma National Bank fraud investigation.
    		• 1981->????2006->????(23)
  • The FBI, FDIC, DOJ, and Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) covered-up bankers' fraud, economic development fraud, and money laundering (for years). Re: the missing 1981/82 Oklahoma National Bank fraud investigation.
    		• 1981->????2006->????(23)
  • The FBI framed me in the act of website retaliation. I operated and still operate the website Prowlingowl.com exposing evidence of crimes the FBI and others were and are still covering up in Colorado and Oklahoma, and evidence points to other states.
    		• 2006???? 
  • The FBI used my career and efforts to expose crimes to justify transferring (stealing) the case from Colorado to Oklahoma. The FBI did not investigate the case they stole.
    		• 2006????View
  • The FBI intended to use me as a shield to avoid exposure to victims, witnesses, and evidence of the crimes.
    		• 2009  
  • The FBI's bungled investigation was not revealed or filed with the court in the case - OKWD 15 CR 00085 (the 2016 trial)(1.7). This caused the DOJ to keep FBI agents from testifying under oath and led to 3 mutually contradicting versions of the same crimes - FBI v FDIC v DOJ.
    		• xxxxxxxxView
  • The FBI and FDIC had previously covered up for the same banker, Paul H. Doughty and others, in the case of the missing 1981/82 Oklahoma National Bank, Oklahoma City, OK, bank fraud investigation.
    		• 1982????View(23)
  • It was the FBI that told me they couldn't find the investigation
    		• View
  • Later after the 1,500 confidential Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC) emails tripped up, cover-up, the FBI attempted to bribe my help in framing innocent parties for crimes in Colorado.
    		• View
  • The three-way mutually contradicting versions of crimes - FBI v FDIC v DOJ.
    		• 2009->????2011->2017View
  • FBI banker's fraud, fixes, and framing Oklahoma and Colorado.
    		• 2005->????2006->????View
  • Fraudulent economic development tax credit investment claims included counterfeit (fraudulently obtained) tax credits found in the Confidential Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC) emails.
    		• 2005->????2006->????View
    The Altus OK Bank Group is one of 16 groups involved. It refers to First State Bank, Altus, OK, the bank holding company FSB Bancorp Altus, OK, and bank subsidiaries and affiliates.

    Note: It is essential to recognize that these bank subsidiaries are non-banking subsidiaries and come under the Federal Reserve, not the FDIC. Bank of Oklahoma (evidence of its crimes is found elsewhere on this site) are banking subsidiaries that come under the FDIC and are backed by the FDIC. Both committed similar criminal fraud, but there is a difference between agencies responsible for certain parts of the crimes, e.g., money laundering.
    Back To Top   
    Copyright 2007 - 2025 ProwlingOwl.com   See disclosures   Email: taxwatch@prowlingowl.com.